Nonparametric Regression Analysis of BE4DBE2 Relationship with n and z Variables using Naive Bayes and SVM Classification on Nuclear Data

Ruben Cornelius Siagian

doi:10.18495/comengapp.v12i3.443

[1] M. Liu, S. Hu, Y. Ge, G. B. Heuvelink, Z. Ren, and X. Huang, “Using multiple linear regression and random forests to identify spatial poverty determinants in rural China,” Spatial Statistics, vol. 42, p. 100461, 2021.
[2] K. Yadav and R. Thareja, “Comparing the performance of naive bayes and decision tree classification using R,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, vol. 11, no. 12, p. 11, 2019.
[3] P. Vicente-Valdez, L. Bernstein, and M. Fratoni, “Nuclear data evaluation augmented by machine learning,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 163, p. 108596, 2021.
[4] S. Nosratabadi et al., “Data science in economics: comprehensive review of advanced machine learning and deep learning methods,” Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 10, p. 1799, 2020.
[5] K. A. Polzin, A. K. Martin, F. M. Curran, R. M. Myers, and M. A. Rodriguez, “Strategy for Developing Technologies for Megawatt-class Nuclear Electric Propulsion Systems,” presented at the 2022 International Electric Propulsion Conference, 2022.
[6] A. Abdulhafedh, “Comparison between common statistical modeling techniques used in research, including: Discriminant analysis vs logistic regression, ridge regression vs LASSO, and decision tree vs random forest,” Open Access Library Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1–19, 2022.
[7] P. Illy, G. Kaddoum, C. M. Moreira, K. Kaur, and S. Garg, “Securing fog-to-things environment using intrusion detection system based on ensemble learning,” presented at the 2019 IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC), IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–7.
[8] S. Adumene, R. Islam, M. T. Amin, S. Nitonye, M. Yazdi, and K. T. Johnson, “Advances in nuclear power system design and fault-based condition monitoring towards safety of nuclear-powered ships,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 251, p. 111156, 2022.
[9] D. Maulud and A. M. Abdulazeez, “A review on linear regression comprehensive in machine learning,” Journal of Applied Science and Technology Trends, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 140–147, 2020.
[10] N. Shrestha, “Detecting multicollinearity in regression analysis,” American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 39–42, 2020.
[11] D. Alita, A. D. Putra, and D. Darwis, “Analysis of classic assumption test and multiple linear regression coefficient test for employee structural office recommendation,” IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems), vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1–5, 2021.
[12] J. P. Hoffmann, Linear regression models: applications in R. Crc Press, 2021.
[13] J. Lospinoso and T. A. Snijders, “Goodness of fit for stochastic actor-oriented models,” Methodological Innovations, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 2059799119884282, 2019.
[14] C. Flatt and R. L. Jacobs, “Principle assumptions of regression analysis: Testing, techniques, and statistical reporting of imperfect data sets,” Advances in Developing Human Resources, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 484–502, 2019.
[15] H. Demirhan, “dLagM: An R package for distributed lag models and ARDL bounds testing,” Plos one, vol. 15, no. 2, p. e0228812, 2020.
[16] R. D. Banker, A. Amirteimoori, and R. P. Sinha, “An integrated Data Envelopment Analysis and generalized additive model for assessing managerial ability with application to the insurance industry,” Decision Analytics Journal, vol. 4, p. 100115, 2022.
[17] A. Shehadeh, O. Alshboul, R. E. Al Mamlook, and O. Hamedat, “Machine learning models for predicting the residual value of heavy construction equipment: An evaluation of modified decision tree, LightGBM, and XGBoost regression,” Automation in Construction, vol. 129, p. 103827, 2021.
[18] T. Thomas, A. P. Vijayaraghavan, S. Emmanuel, T. Thomas, A. P. Vijayaraghavan, and S. Emmanuel, “Applications of decision trees,” Machine learning approaches in cyber security analytics, pp. 157–184, 2020.
[19] J. Li, M. Lin, Y. Li, and X. Wang, “Transfer learning network for nuclear power plant fault diagnosis with unlabeled data under varying operating conditions,” Energy, vol. 254, p. 124358, 2022.
[20] Y. Liu, J. Xu, Y. Tao, T. Fang, W. Du, and A. Ye, “Rapid and accurate identification of marine microbes with single-cell Raman spectroscopy,” Analyst, vol. 145, no. 9, pp. 3297–3305, 2020.
[21] D. van den Bergh et al., “A tutorial on Bayesian multi-model linear regression with BAS and JASP,” Behavior research methods, pp. 1–21, 2021.
[22] D. F. Schmidt and E. Makalic, “Bayesian generalized horseshoe estimation of generalized linear models,” presented at the Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases: European Conference, ECML PKDD 2019, Würzburg, Germany, September 16–20, 2019, Proceedings, Part II, Springer, 2020, pp. 598–613.
[23] C. Argyropoulos and A. P. Grieve, “The Letter Pi: Bayesian interpretation of p-values, Reproducibility and Considerations for Replication in the Generalized Linear Model,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.00636, 2023.

Abstract viewed - 364 times
PDF downloaded - 344 times

Affiliations

Ruben Cornelius Siagian
Departemen of Physics, Universitas Negeri Medan

Content Top

Nonparametric Regression Analysis of BE4DBE2 Relationship with n and z Variables using Naive Bayes and SVM Classification on Nuclear Data

Ruben Cornelius Siagian

Vol 12 No 3 (2023)

DOI 10.18495/comengapp.v12i3.443

Submitted: May 18, 2023

Published: Oct 1, 2023

Abstract

This research article describes several analyses of nuclear data using various statistical methods. The first analysis uses linear regression to investigate the relationship between the independent variables (n and z) and the response variable (BE4DBE2). The second analysis uses a nonparametric regression model to overcome the assumptions of normality and linearity in the data. The third analysis uses the Naive Bayes method to classify nuclear data based on variables n and z. The fourth analysis uses a decision tree to classify nuclear data based on the same variables. Finally, the article describes an SVM analysis and a K-means analysis to classify and group nuclide data. The article presents clear and organized descriptions of each analysis, including visual representations of the results. The findings of each analysis are discussed, providing valuable insights into the relationships between the variables and the response variable. The article demonstrates the usefulness of statistical methods in analyzing nuclear data.